GRC evidence API

Send evidence from systems already doing the work.

GRiCk gives developers and authorised systems a scoped API path for evidence, attestations and supporting metadata without waiting for the next assessment request.

Evidence delay is often a hand-off problem. A control operates in a delivery or security system, but proof is collected later through tickets, screenshots and spreadsheets. The GRiCk API brings that proof into the assurance record while its context is still available.

A governed integration contract for evidence

CI/CD jobs, cloud platforms, scanners, SOC tooling and internal systems submit evidence against the applicable GRiCk record. Scoped credentials constrain the caller. Idempotent requests prevent retries from creating uncontrolled duplicates.

Teams can integrate evidence movement into existing delivery paths instead of building a parallel collection process for every audit.

Retain the context needed for review

An evidence object is useful only when a reviewer can understand where it came from, what it supports and how current it is. GRiCk retains source, provenance, timestamps, verification state and the links to systems and controls.

That record supports assessment without treating every automated submission as accepted proof.

  • Source system and submission identity
  • Applicable system, control and requirement
  • Freshness and verification state
  • Audit history for changes and review

Turn evidence events into current control state

As new evidence arrives or existing evidence ages, assurance teams can see which controls remain supported and which records need review. APIs and webhooks connect that state to the surrounding operating environment.

The result is an evidence pipeline that supports continuous attestation without removing assessment judgement or accountable approval.

Questions buyers ask

What can submit evidence to GRiCk?

Authorised delivery, cloud, security and internal systems can integrate through scoped API paths matched to the intended tenant and workspace boundary.

Is submitted evidence automatically accepted?

No. Submission and acceptance are separate states. Verification and review remain part of the assurance workflow.

Can developers keep their existing tools?

Yes. The integration model moves evidence from existing engineering and security workflows. Developers do not need a separate collection interface.

Trace a real control before you buy.

Bring one system, one control, one evidence source and your deployment boundary. We will trace the record from source to decision.