Cyber GRC assessments

Assess the control. Keep the record.

GRiCk joins assessment scope, evidence requests, assessor notes, findings, risk treatment, approvals and reassessment dates around the system being assessed.

A cyber GRC assessment is only defensible when its conclusion can be traced to the system context, control test, evidence and reviewer. GRiCk keeps that chain together throughout the assessment and authorisation lifecycle.

A cyber security assessment workflow with provenance

Assessment work starts with scope: the system, its owners, security category, operating environment and applicable controls. Evidence requests then stay linked to that scope instead of becoming a parallel spreadsheet and email trail.

Assessors can record notes, findings and follow-up work against the relevant evidence and control. The resulting package preserves who supplied the material, who reviewed it and what decision was made.

Support the authority to operate lifecycle

GRiCk supports the operating record around an authority to operate: intake, control scope, evidence, assessment activity, residual risk, approval conditions and reassessment timing. It does not replace the authorising officer or independently grant accreditation.

Readiness can be reviewed before approval, while named approvers, typed signatures, timestamps and conditions remain with the authorisation record.

  • System scope and security context
  • Assessment package readiness
  • Residual risk and unresolved findings
  • Approval conditions and reassessment dates

Reduce assessment delay at the evidence boundary

Many controls are operating before their evidence reaches the assessor. Developers, scanners, CI/CD jobs and security platforms can submit evidence metadata through scoped APIs while agents use MCP to work with the correct tenant, system and ATO context.

Freshness and verification state help the team distinguish current evidence from material that is expiring, expired, invalid or awaiting review.

Keep findings and decisions usable after the assessment

Assessment output should remain operational. Linked risks, actions, exceptions and control health make the completed assessment useful for remediation and continuous monitoring, rather than freezing it as a point-in-time document.

Questions buyers ask

Does GRiCk perform or certify an IRAP assessment?

No. GRiCk supports evidence and assessment workflows. An appropriately authorised assessor and accountable government decision-maker retain their formal roles.

Can evidence be reused across assessments?

A single evidence record can be linked to multiple relevant controls, requirements, risks and ATOs while preserving its source and provenance.

What happens after approval?

Conditions, reassessment dates, evidence freshness and linked risks remain visible so the authorisation record can be maintained over time.

Trace a real control before you buy.

Bring one system, one control, one evidence source and your deployment boundary. We will trace the record from source to decision.